Just a little bit less debug logging

diff --git a/citadel/modules/inboxrules/serv_inboxrules.c b/citadel/modules/inboxrules/serv_inboxrules.c
index 720d63fa5dbfcad340535e3d7792d336891c4d43..fa30f2534bacb6f731e536bfc0a56548a17f8429 100644 (file)
--- a/citadel/modules/inboxrules/serv_inboxrules.c
+++ b/citadel/modules/inboxrules/serv_inboxrules.c
@@ -384,10 +384,7 @@ int inbox_do_redirect(struct irule *rule, long msgnum) {
  * Perform the "reject" action (delete the message, and tell the sender we deleted it)
  */
 void inbox_do_reject(struct irule *rule, struct CtdlMessage *msg) {
-       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "inbox_do_reject: sender: <%s>, reject message: <%s>",
-               msg->cm_fields[erFc822Addr],
-               rule->autoreply_message
-       );
+       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "inbox_do_reject: sender: <%s>, reject", msg->cm_fields[erFc822Addr]);
 
        // If we can't determine who sent the message, reject silently.
        char *sender;
@@ -436,10 +433,7 @@ void inbox_do_reject(struct irule *rule, struct CtdlMessage *msg) {
  * Perform the "vacation" action (send an automatic response)
  */
 void inbox_do_vacation(struct irule *rule, struct CtdlMessage *msg) {
-       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "inbox_do_vacation: sender: <%s>, vacation message: <%s>",
-               msg->cm_fields[erFc822Addr],
-               rule->autoreply_message
-       );
+       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "inbox_do_vacation: sender: <%s>, vacation", msg->cm_fields[erFc822Addr]);
 
        // If we can't determine who sent the message, no auto-reply can be sent.
        char *sender;
@@ -654,35 +648,28 @@ void inbox_do_msg(long msgnum, void *userdata) {
                                        case fcomp_contains:
                                        case fcomp_matches:
                                                rule_activated = (bmstrcasestr(compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value) ? 1 : 0);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Does %s contain %s? %s", compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value, rule_activated?"yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                        case fcomp_notcontains:
                                        case fcomp_notmatches:
                                                rule_activated = (bmstrcasestr(compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value) ? 0 : 1);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Does %s contain %s? %s", compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value, rule_activated?"yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                        case fcomp_is:
                                                rule_activated = (strcasecmp(compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value) ? 0 : 1);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Does %s equal %s? %s", compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value, rule_activated?"yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                        case fcomp_isnot:
                                                rule_activated = (strcasecmp(compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value) ? 1 : 0);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Does %s equal %s? %s", compare_me, ii->rules[i].compared_value, rule_activated?"yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                }
                                break;
 
                        case field_size:
                                rule_activated = 0;
-                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "comparing actual message size %ld to rule message size %ld", smi.meta_rfc822_length, ii->rules[i].compared_size);
                                switch(ii->rules[i].field_compare_op) {
                                        case scomp_larger:
                                                rule_activated = ((smi.meta_rfc822_length > ii->rules[i].compared_size) ? 1 : 0);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Is %ld larger than %ld? %s", smi.meta_rfc822_length, ii->rules[i].compared_size, (smi.meta_rfc822_length > ii->rules[i].compared_size) ? "yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                        case scomp_smaller:
                                                rule_activated = ((smi.meta_rfc822_length < ii->rules[i].compared_size) ? 1 : 0);
-                                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Is %ld smaller than %ld? %s", smi.meta_rfc822_length, ii->rules[i].compared_size, (smi.meta_rfc822_length < ii->rules[i].compared_size) ? "yes":"no");
                                                break;
                                }
                                break;
@@ -690,7 +677,7 @@ void inbox_do_msg(long msgnum, void *userdata) {
                                rule_activated = 1;
                                break;
                        default:                        // no matches, fall through and do nothing
-                               syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "inboxrules: an unknown field comparison was encountered");
+                               syslog(LOG_WARNING, "inboxrules: an unknown field comparison was encountered");
                                rule_activated = 0;
                                break;
                }
@@ -781,10 +768,6 @@ void do_inbox_processing_for_user(long usernum) {
                return;                                         // config message exists but body is null
        }
 
-
-       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "ii->lastproc                 %ld", ii->lastproc);
-       syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "CC->user.lastproc_inboxrules %ld", CC->user.lastproc_inboxrules);
-
        if (ii->lastproc > CC->user.lastproc_inboxrules) {      // There might be a "last message processed" number left over
                CC->user.lastproc_inboxrules = ii->lastproc;    // in the ruleset from a previous version.  Use this if it is
        }                                                       // a higher number.